GT Progressive News: JUST IN: DOJ responds to Peter STRZOK's lawyer's claim that the ex-FBI agent's notes on the FLYNN docket "appear to have been altered," saying the added dates were sticky notes that were "inadvertently not removed" when the records were scanned.

Wednesday, October 7, 2020

JUST IN: DOJ responds to Peter STRZOK's lawyer's claim that the ex-FBI agent's notes on the FLYNN docket "appear to have been altered," saying the added dates were sticky notes that were "inadvertently not removed" when the records were scanned.

JUST IN: DOJ responds to Peter STRZOK's lawyer's claim that the ex-FBI agent's notes on the FLYNN docket "appear to have been altered," saying the added dates were sticky notes that were "inadvertently not removed" when the records were scanned. pic.twitter.com/UQNABmz9HK
— Megan Mineiro (@MMineiro_CNS) October 7, 2020