This succinct thread by @brett_mcgurk is how things are supposed to work when tensions are high: use reason, facts, & consensus; limit miscalculations; get other nations on board, develop a coordinated plan. This reduces unintended consequences...like, a lot of people dying. https://t.co/t2WIPcZ8pY— Mark Hertling (@MarkHertling) September 16, 2019
This seems to be the case with U.S. policy towards Iran, as I argued in more detail earlier this summer, including here👉https://t.co/lDbntgOH84— Brett McGurk (@brett_mcgurk) September 16, 2019
All the while, if this weekend's attack was launched from Iran, we should presume Tehran has priced in a Saudi or US response and prepared its counter, with another rung up the escalatory ladder. With everyone “locked and loaded” – it's a good time to slow down, and think.Making the case publicly to justify a limited Saudi response – should they wish to act – may be the best of bad options. But any such action must be preceded and followed by proactive US-led engagement in the region and around the world to mitigate risks of spiral.— Brett McGurk (@brett_mcgurk) September 16, 2019